Bickham v. Day et al
Tony D. Bickham |
Mississippi Department of Correction Probation and Parole, Travis Day and Lynn Fitch |
Pro Se Department |
1:2024cv00046 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Halil S Ozerden |
Bradley W Rath |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Travis Day, Lynn Fitch, Mississippi Department of Correction Probation and Parole (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty), #2 Exhibit B (Transcript of Guilty Plea), #3 Exhibit C (Order of Conviction and Sentence), #4 Exhibit D (Transcript of Sentencing Hearing), #5 Errata E (Inmate Time Computation Sheet), #6 Exhibit F (Affidavit to revoke PRS signed June 2022), #7 Exhibit G (Warrant issued for Bickham by Pearl River County Circuit Court in June 2022), #8 Exhibit H (Withdrawal of June 2022 Warrant filed in Pearl River County Circuit Court), #9 Exhibit I (Affidavit filed by MDOC May 2024 for violation of PRS), #10 Exhibit J (Warrant issued by Pearl River County Circuit Court March 2024 for T. Bickham on violation of terms of PRS))(Owens-State Gov, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Travis Day served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (JCH) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Lynn Fitch served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (JCH) |
Filing 5 ORDER: That the Respondents, through Honorable Lynn Fitch, file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within 20 days of the service uponthe said Honorable Lynn Fitch of a copy of this order. That Clerk serve by certified mail, copies of the Petition #1 , Order #2 Petitioners Response #3 , and a copy of this Order upon Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Warden Travis Day, Rayburn Correctional Center, 27268 Highway 21, Angie, LA 70427. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 3/15/24. (RLW) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Clerk is directed to edit the docket to reflect that Travis Day, Warden of Rayburn Correctional Center in Angie, Louisiana, and Honorable Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi are the proper respondents; and edit the short title to Bickham v. Day. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 3/15/24. (RLW) |
Filing 3 Response to Order re #2 ORDER, filed by Tony D. Bickham (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3: L.U.Civ.R. 11.(a) states that all documents filed and signed by a party not represented by attorney(s) must contain the party's name, and current address. Party is advised to comply with the requirement in future filings. Plaintiff is also advised to properly format the first page of future filed pleadings to include the court style, case style, case number and a title. (RLW) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing Petitioner on or before 3/19/24 to respond and name the proper respondents. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 3/4/24. (AAO) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00, receipt number 7329), filed by Tony D. Bickham (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit Being Challenge of Argument, #2 Exhibit B - Warrant Being Challenge of Argument, #3 Exhibit C - Documentation/Information Confirming Argument of Challenge, #4 Memorandum, #5 Envelope, #6 Notice of Assignment) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.