Hale v. Van et al
| David Hale |
| Thanh Tran Van and Dui Do |
| 1:2024cv00049 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT against defendants Dui Do and Thanh Tran Van. (ASJ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Entry of Default Against Defendants by David Hale (Herrington, Brian) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER directing Plaintiff to take action to move this case forward within 30 days. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 3/22/24 (HM)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Hale. Dui Do served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Hale. Thanh Tran Van served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dui Do, Thanh Tran Van. (wld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dui Do, Thanh Tran Van ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 5334008), filed by David Hale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
| Issued summons emailed to Brian K. Herrington at email address on docket. (wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
