Bankson et al v. Travel Insured International, Inc. et al
| Clyde Bankson and Sharon Bankson |
| Travel Insured International, Inc. and United States Fire Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv00092 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Travel Insured International, Inc., United States Fire Insurance Company. (wld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Travel Insured International, Inc., United States Fire Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405; receipt number 5366906), filed by Clyde Bankson, Sharon Bankson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Worldwide Trip Protector Plan, #2 Exhibit 2 - 10.08.23 Email, #3 Exhibit 3 - Trip Cancellation Form, #4 Exhibit 4 - 12.21.23 and 12.27.23 Denial Letters, #5 Exhibit 5 - 1.04.24 Denial Letter, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2.07.24 Denial Letter, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 1. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to label each exhibit with a letter/number in future filings. (JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
