Armstrong et al v. City of Long Beach, Mississippi et al
| Richard W. Armstrong, Harry Bradshaw, Judith Bradshaw, Stephen McNally and Vomck, LLC |
| City of Long Beach, Mississippi, Michael Gundlach, Louis Dewitt Roberts, Alan J. Simmons, AJS Properties, LLC, Aerocare Holdings, LLC and John Does 1-25 |
| 1:2024cv00103 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Long Beach, Mississippi, Michael Gundlach from Harrison County Chancery Court, case number 24-373(3). (Filing fee $ 405; receipt number 5372732) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons Return Executed City, #3 Exhibit C - Summons Return Executed Gundlach, #4 Exhibit D - First Amended Complaint, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
