Sims v. Miller et al
Wesley Robert Sims |
Joshua Finkley, Keith Miller and Michael Cunningham |
Pro Se Department |
1:2024cv00179 |
June 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Bradley W Rath |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Response to Order re #9 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND, #11 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SIGN filed by Wesley Robert Sims (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 11 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SIGN: On or before August 6, 2024, Plaintiff shall place his original signature on the unsigned Response #10 and return it to the Clerk of Court. Failure to comply with this Order in a timely manner will result in the unsigned document being stricken from the record without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 7/23/2024 (CRT) |
Filing 10 (Unsigned)Response to Order re #9 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND filed by Wesley Robert Sims (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND: Plaintiff shall file a written response consistent with this Order by July 26, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 7/12/2024 (CRT) |
Filing 8 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 7/12/2024 (CRT) |
Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 Acknowledgement filed by Wesley Robert Sims. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 6 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 7/24/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 6/24/2024 (CRT) |
Filing 5 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Wesley Robert Sims (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 4 ORDER SEVERING HABEAS CLAIMS: Ordered that habeas claims are severed from Plaintiff's claims under 1983. Clerk of Court shall open a new civil action under 28 USC 2254 in the Southern Division. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 6/21/24. (JCH) |
Filing 3 ORDER: on or before 7/15/2024, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 6/14/2024 (CRT) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Wesley Robert Sims (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Cunningham, Joshua Finkley, Keith Miller, filed by Wesley Robert Sims. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.