Markos v. Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce
| Steven Lamont Markos |
| Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce |
| 1:2024cv00250 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #7 Ad-In Advertising, LLC's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the #11 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Ad-In Advertising, LLC. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by District Judge Taylor B. McNeel on 10/8/2024. (KAB)
|
| Filing 14 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 11/7/2024 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. (SR) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn P. Goff on behalf of Steven Lamont Markos (Goff, Kathryn) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce.(Coffman, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Defendant Ad-In Advertising, LLC by Steven Lamont Markos (Carson, Dorsey) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint. Defendant Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce's answer or other responsive pleading is now due by 10/1/2024. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on September 27, 2024 (pl)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #10: Proposed orders are not to be electronically filed as a separate pleading or as an attachment to a pleading, but instead are to be provided to chambers by e-mail (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec.5.B.). A previous docket annotation was entered on 9/18/24 advising attorney of this procedure. (RLW) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Coffman, Andrew) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce's answer or other responsive pleading is now due by 9/24/2024. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on September 18, 2024 (pl)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #8: Proposed orders are not to be electronically filed as a separate pleading or as an attachment to a pleading, but instead are to be provided to chambers by e-mail (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec.5.B.). (RLW) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark N. Halbert on behalf of Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce (Halbert, Mark) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Coffman, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Ad-In Advertising, LLC (Beaver, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Ad-In Advertising, LLC.(Beaver, Stephanie) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #6: Advising attorney that a Motion and Answer should not be combined as one document. The Motion should have been a separate document. Attorney is advised to file this same pdf document as a Motion to Dismiss. (RLW) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Lamont Markos. Ad-In Advertising, LLC served on 8/23/2024, answer due 9/13/2024., Subpoena Returned Executed as to Ad-In Advertising, Inc.. (Carson, Dorsey) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Lamont Markos. Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce served on 8/20/2024, answer due 9/10/2024. (Carson, Dorsey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAILING OF Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding Copyright re #1 Complaint. (wld) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ad-In Advertising, LLC, Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce. (wld) |
| Issued summons emailed to Dorsey R. Carson, Jr. at email address on docket. (wld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Ad-In Advertising, LLC, Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 5476473), filed by Steven Lamont Markos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Registration, #2 Exhibit 2-Copyright Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) Modified on 8/16/2024 to correct file date (wld). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Markos v. Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Lamont Markos | |
| Represented By: | Dorsey R. Carson, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Kathryn P. Goff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ocean Springs Chamber of Commerce | |
| Represented By: | Mark N. Halbert |
| Represented By: | Andrew W. Coffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
