Nguyen v. Le et al
| Loi Van Nguyen |
| F/V Le Family and Phong Le |
| 1:2024cv00251 |
| August 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 Jones Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Anh Joseph Cao be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Plaintiff Loi Van Nguyen in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 8/23/2024 (AB)
|
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Anh Joseph Cao to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5481052) by Loi Van Nguyen (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Lagarde, Ross) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to F/V Le Family, Phong Le. (wld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against F/V Le Family, Phong Le ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 5476622), filed by Loi Van Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
| Emailed issued summons to Ross F. Lagarde at email address on docket. (wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
