Depree v. Saunders et al
| Chauncey M. Depree, Jr. |
| Martha Saunders, Darrell J. Grimes, Alvin J. Williams, Steven Jackson, Stanley X. Lewis, Farhang Niroomand, D. Harold Doty, Patricia Munn, John Albert Brown, James Henderson, Mary Anderson, Roderick Posey, Charles Jordan, Gwendolyn Pate and John Does 1-80 |
| 2:2007cv00185 |
| September 7, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| Adams |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
ORDER granting 134 Motion Seeking Leave to Take Trial Depositions; granting 158 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on April 16, 2010. (Harris, M.)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER denying Defendants' 106 Motion for Bill of Costs. Said request is denied as not recoverable under Section 1920 or as not properly documented. The Plaintiff's 107 Motion to Strike is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 18, 2008 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting Defendants' 38 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying as moot any other pending motions. Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. A separate judgment shall be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on September 30, 2008 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
