Rayborn v. Moore
Plaintiff: Jerry Lavon Rayborn
Defendant: James Moore
Case Number: 2:2009cv00096
Filed: May 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION dismissing complaint with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). A separate final judgment shall be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on June 15, 2009 (dsl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rayborn v. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Lavon Rayborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?