Kirby et al v. Bank of America, NA et al
Clinton E. Kirby and Martha B. Kirby |
Bank of America, NA, BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. and Recontrust Company, NA |
2:2009cv00182 |
September 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Hattiesburg Office |
Forrest |
Keith Starrett |
John M. Roper |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 ORDER denying 124 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 5/7/2012 (PL) |
Filing 122 ORDER granting 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing 83 Motion in Limine; dismissing 86 Motion in Limine; dismissing 119 Motion to Cease and Desist. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/22/2012 (PL) |
Filing 104 ORDER granting 82 Motion to Substitute Party. BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. terminated; denying 94 Motion to Strike; granting Plaintiffs 30-day limited discovery. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/6/2011 (PL) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying 49 Motion to Strike. Plaintiffs have 60 days to correct their deficient expert designation. Defendants then have 30 days to designate a new expert, if any, to rebut Plaintiffs' expert. Discovery is reopened for this limited purpose only. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 7/27/2011 (nr) |
Filing 12 ORDER denying 3 Motion to Remand; granting 6 Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 1/6/2010 (at) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.