HEI Resources East OMG v. S. Lavon Evans, Jr. Operating Co., Inc. et al
| HEI Resources East OMG |
| S. Lavon Evans, Jr., E&D Services, Inc. and S. Lavon Evans, Jr. Operating Co., Inc. |
| 2:2009mc00097 |
| May 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Regarding Terms and Conditions of Existing Protective Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on July 23, 2009 (dsl)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #1 Motion to Quash filed by S. Lavon Evans Jr. Operating Co., Inc., et al. Mark White, attorney for Movant, should submit any suggested amendments to the Protective Order to the Court on or before 5:00 p.m. this date. Plaintiff will be allowed until 5:00 p.m. July 23, 2009, to respond to same. Following suggested amendments and responses the Court will determine whether the Protective Order in place is sufficient or whether any suggested amendment should be required by this Court. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on July 22, 2009 (dsl)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Keith Starrett: Telephonic Hearing on #1 Motion to Quash was held. Argument was presented and the Court determined that the Motion to Quash Subpoena should be denied. An order will be entered on same. Participating in the hearing on behalf of the Plaintiff was David L. Martindale and Lori Hood; participating on behalf of the Defendants were Kris A. Powell, Mark Nelson and Mark White. (dsl) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Martindale on behalf of HEI Resources East OMG (Martindale, David) |
| Filing 4 Rebuttal re #3 Reply to Response to Motion filed by HEI Resources East OMG (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Martindale, David) |
| Filing 3 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by S. Lavon Evans, Jr. Operating Co., Inc., S. Lavon Evans, Jr, E&D Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, January 12, 2009 Transcript Excerpt)(Powell, Kris) |
| Filing 2 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by HEI Resources East OMG (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O)(Martindale, David) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER. After conferring with attorneys, the Court orders that the movants/defendants should not be required to respond to the subpoena and deposition upon written questions until after the court has ruled on the Motion to Quash #1 . The plaintiff/respondent shall respond to the motion and the parties shall contact the court regarding a hearing on same. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on May 27, 2009 (dsl)
|
|
AMENDED TEXT ORDER. The previous text order is amended to provide that the Bank of Jones County is not required to respond to the subpoena, etc., until the Motion to Quash has been resolved by the court. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on May 27, 2009 (dsl)
|
| Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker added. (AKL) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash by S. Lavon Evans, Jr. Operating Co., Inc., S. Lavon Evans, Jr, E&D Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(AKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
