Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mary P. Ainsworth
Defendant: Cargotec USA Inc., Moffett Engineering, Ltd. and John Does 1-5
Case Number: 2:2010cv00236
Filed: September 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Smith
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 209 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 163 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot Defendants' 167 195 Motions to Strike. The Court denies the Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's negligence claim, but the Court grants it in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on January 30, 2014 (dsl)
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 125 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 100 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 100 Motion for Leave to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal. The Court certifies that its 9/23/11 Memorandum Opinion and Order 86 involves a controlling question of law a s to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of this litigation. Further, these proceedings are stayed until the Fifth Circuit has either rejected the application or completed the appeal process. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 12/15/11 (scp)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER denying Defendant Moffett Engineering, Ltd.'s 59 65 Motions for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on September 23, 2011 (dsl)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Counsel for all parties shall contact the Magistrate Judge within 3 days of the entry of this Order to schedule a Case Management Conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/9/11 (scp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary P. Ainsworth
Represented By: John G. Corlew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cargotec USA Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moffett Engineering, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?