South Mississippi Electric Power Association v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff: South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Counter_claimant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Counter_defendant: South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Case Number: 2:2010cv00310
Filed: December 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Forrest
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 61 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on August 11, 2011 (dsl)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint within 10 days, as set forth in the Opinion and Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/9/11 (scp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: South Mississippi Electric Power Association v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Romney H. Entrekin
Represented By: R. Braxton Hill - PHV, IV
Represented By: Peeler Grayson Lacey, Jr.
Represented By: David B. Lacy - PHV
Represented By: Michael W. Smith - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Represented By: Stephanie Marie Adams Archuleta - PHV
Represented By: Derek Royce Arrington
Represented By: Jeff C. Bowman
Represented By: Kelvin J. Dowd - PHV
Represented By: Frank J. Pergolizzi - PHV
Represented By: William L. Slover - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Represented By: Kelvin J. Dowd - PHV
Represented By: Jeff C. Bowman
Represented By: Derek Royce Arrington
Represented By: Stephanie Marie Adams Archuleta - PHV
Represented By: Frank J. Pergolizzi - PHV
Represented By: William L. Slover - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Romney H. Entrekin
Represented By: R. Braxton Hill - PHV, IV
Represented By: Peeler Grayson Lacey, Jr.
Represented By: David B. Lacy - PHV
Represented By: Michael W. Smith - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?