Smith v. The Hartford Life Insurance Company et al
| Wanda Smith |
| The Hartford Life Insurance Company, The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, John Does 1-10 and Companies A-J |
| 2:2011cv00035 |
| February 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| Forrest |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss Paragraphs 10-12 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Plaintiff's Claims for Extracontractual Damages 22 . A separate Judgment shall be entered. Additionally, the Stay is lifted and this case is returned to the administrative track. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 22, 2011 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's 4 Motion to Dismiss State Law Causes of Action; denying Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Remand to State Court. This case is returned to the Administrative Track and the att orneys for the parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order to schedule a Case Management Conference. A separate Judgment shall be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on April 13, 2011 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
