Leaf River Cellulose, LLC v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company
| Leaf River Cellulose, LLC |
| Mid-Continent Casualty Company |
| Jackson & Jackson Industrial Contractors |
| 2:2011cv00054 |
| March 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER granting 40 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 87 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 107 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 108 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and granting 109 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on May 25, 2012 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Jackson & Jackson Industrial Contractors, Inc. as to its duty to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold Leaf River Cellulose, LLC harmless with respect to the Calhoun case; and granting [7 2] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Leaf River Cellulose, LLC with respect to Jackson & Jackson Industrial Contractors, Inc.'s liability for failing to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold Leaf River Cellulose, LLC harmless with respect to the Calhoun case. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on March 27, 2012 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
