Chamberlin v. Epps et al
| Lisa Jo Chamberlin |
| Christopher Epps and Jim Hood |
| 2:2011cv00072 |
| March 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Forrest |
| Carlton W. Reeves |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 105 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Petitioner to report within 30 days whether she intends to return to state court to exhaust issues. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on January 11, 2022 (Rushing, Terryl)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting ore tenus motion to file proposed budget under seal. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on November 22, 2019 (Rushing, Terryl)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 64 Motion to Stay Case; Respondents to notify Court within 30 days of entry of 5th Circuit's mandate. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on May 27, 2015 (Rushing, Terryl)
|
|
Filing
61
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as to Ground Two. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 03/31/2015. (AC)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 7 Motion Appointment of Counsel Nunc Pro Tunc; counsel's appointment effective April 1, 2011. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on August 11, 2011 (Rushing, Terryl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
