Garcia v. Premier Home Furnishings et al
| Francisco Chomyo Garcia, II |
| John Doe Defendants 1-10, Premier Home Furnishings, Terry Hood and Houston Wood Products, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00167 |
| September 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| Lamar |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 106 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and finding as moot Defendant Houston Wood Products, Inc.'s Rule 56(d) 138 Motion. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on June 17, 2014 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 53 Motion for Reconsideration and directing counsel for the parties to contact the chambers of Judge Michael T. Parker within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 12, 2013 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND DENYING Plaintiffs' 19 MOTION TO REMAND. Additionally, Defendant Premier Home Furnishings is dismissed without prejudice. The parties are directed to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within ten (10) days of the date of this Order to arrange for a scheduling conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on August 6, 2013 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
