Fortenberry et al v. Prine et al
John Does 1-5, Minnie Simmons, Lashekia Simmons, Adrien Fortenberry and Ashley Fortenberry |
Greater East Lampton Church, Inc., Chris E. Prine and Church Mutual Insurance Company |
2:2014cv00056 |
April 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
Marion |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER denying Motion 50 to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on November 3, 2014. (ES) |
Filing 74 ORDER granting 65 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 72 Motion to Expedite; withdrawing Order 62 denying Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 16, 2014. (ES) |
Filing 62 ORDER denying 50 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 7, 2014. (ES) |
Filing 60 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 28 Motion for Reconsideration or for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 3, 2014 (dsl) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 16 Motion to Remand. Additionally, Defendant Greater East Lampton Church, Inc., is dismissed as improperly joined. The parties shall immediately contact the chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge Micheal T. Parker to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on July 2, 2014 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.