Turnage et al v. Messersmith Manufacturing, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Davis Turnage and Angela Turnage |
| MesserSmith Manufacturing, Inc. and John Does A through Z |
| 2:2014cv00124 |
| August 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Lawrence |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 41 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 4/14/2016 (scp)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against McConnell Technologies are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/9/2016 (scp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; granting Plaintiffs' 11 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; and denying Plaintiffs' 12 Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery. Plaintiffs& #039; claims against Defendant Messersmith Manufacturing, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall file their Amended Complaint within two (2) weeks of the entry of this order. Failure to do so may lead to the dismissal of this case in its entirety. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on January 14, 2015 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
