Lott v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
Rhonda D. Lott |
Forrest County, Mississippi, Charles Bolton and Andrea Estrada |
2:2014cv00131 |
August 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
Covington |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/16/2016 (scp) |
Filing 80 ORDER denying Defendants Chief Deputy Charles Bolton and Sergeant Andrea Estrada's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part Defendant Forrest County, Mississippi's 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defend ant Forrest County's motion is granted as to the following claims: First Amendment retaliation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 with respect to Lott's transfer; race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and Title VII; racial harassment under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and Title VII; retaliation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and Title VII with respect to Lott's suspension and termination and wrongful discharge. It is denied as to the following claims, which remain pending: First Am endment retaliation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 with respect to Lott's suspension and termination, and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and Title VII with respect to Lott's transfer. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 10, 2015 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.