Galey et al v. Walters et al
| Ryan Galey and Regina Galey |
| Jason Walters and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 2:2014cv00153 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Lamar |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss. The parties are directed to contact the chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within 7 days to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/8/2015 (scp)
|
|
Filing
10
Opinion and Order dismissing without prejudice Plaintiffs' claims against the Defendant for violations of the Stored Communications Act under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2701(a). Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint without fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on January 20, 2015 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying Defendant Jason Walters' 4 Motion to Dismiss. Additionally, the Court directs the Plaintiffs to file a written response with the Court showing cause as to why the Fifth Circuit's decision in Garcia v City of Laredo, Tex., 702 F.3d 788 (5th Cir. 2012) does not require the dismissal of their claims under the Stored Communications Act. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 22, 2014 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
