Hollingsworth et al v. Hercules, Inc.
| Lee Hollingsworth and Scott Hollingsworth |
| Hercules, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv00113 |
| August 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Forrest |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER Re Motion in Limine 118 and Motion in Limine 120 . Responses are due on or before January 19, 2017. Replies may be filed within seven days of the filing of response, but no later than January 26, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/9/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER re Motion to Bifurcate Trial 115 . Plaintiffs shall respond on or before January 17, 2017. Defendant may reply on or before January 24, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/4/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER denying 65 Motion to Exclude; denying 67 Motion to Exclude Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/3/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 23, 2016 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 72 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 22, 2016 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
