Hancock Bank v. Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Hancock Bank
Defendant: Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc., Richard L. Keller, Bulls Eye Express, Inc., Larsen & Keller, LLC and R. L. Kelco, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv00108
Filed: July 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office
County: Lamar
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court grants the fee request and awards Plaintiff $24,642.50 in attorney's fees. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/28/2017 (dtj)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER. Response to 19 Motion for Attorney's Fees is due on or before February 24, 2017. If Plaintiff wants to file a reply, it may do so within seven days of the filing of the Defendant's response, but no later than March 3, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/13/2017 (dtj)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 8 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/27/2017 (dtj)
January 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER. Plaintiff ordered to file a response to this Order on or before February 1, 2017, demonstrating that the parties to this case are completely diverse. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/18/2017 (dtj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hancock Bank v. Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hancock Bank
Represented By: Thomas P. Oldweiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard L. Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bulls Eye Express, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larsen & Keller, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. L. Kelco, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?