Hancock Bank v. Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Hancock Bank |
| Willow Springs Enterprises, Inc., Richard L. Keller, Bulls Eye Express, Inc., Larsen & Keller, LLC and R. L. Kelco, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00108 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Lamar |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court grants the fee request and awards Plaintiff $24,642.50 in attorney's fees. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/28/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. Response to 19 Motion for Attorney's Fees is due on or before February 24, 2017. If Plaintiff wants to file a reply, it may do so within seven days of the filing of the Defendant's response, but no later than March 3, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/13/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/27/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER. Plaintiff ordered to file a response to this Order on or before February 1, 2017, demonstrating that the parties to this case are completely diverse. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/18/2017 (dtj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
