Strickland et al v. Broome
Plaintiff: Elizabeth L. Strickland and The Elizabeth Lance Broome Revocable Trust
Defendant: Amy Alyece Broome
Case Number: 2:2016cv00124
Filed: August 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office
County: Lamar
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 100 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 100 Motion for New Trial; denying 103 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/20/19. (cb)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER TO FEED THE JURY. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 7/24/2018 (dtj)
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion for Clarification and Other Relief. The Court grants the motion insofar as Plaintiffs seek a ruling as to whether they pleaded claims of conversion and breach of contract, but the Court denies the motion in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 4/11/18. (cb)
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court grants the motion as to Plaintiffs' claim of constructive trust, but the Court denies it as to Plaintiffs' claims of conversion and unjust enrichment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/19/18. (cb)
March 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration ; declining to address 50 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/14/18. (cb)
October 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims of breach of fiduciary duty and constructive trust against Defendant USAA are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/19/2017. (cb)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Plaintiffs shall respond on or before August 31, 2017 to Motion to Dismiss 37 . If Defendants want to reply, it must do so on or before September 7, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 8/18/2017 (dtj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strickland et al v. Broome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth L. Strickland
Represented By: S. Robert Hammond, Jr.
Represented By: Nicholas K. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Elizabeth Lance Broome Revocable Trust
Represented By: S. Robert Hammond, Jr.
Represented By: Nicholas K. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Alyece Broome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?