Ford v. Hattiesburg Police Department et al
Justin Ford |
Hattiesburg Police Department, Larry Allen, C. Crabtree, John Doe x 5 and Hattiesburg Internal Affairs |
2:2017cv00088 |
June 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
Rankin |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 32 Motion to Dismiss filed by Larry Allen, C. Crabtree, 37 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the finding of this Court, and the Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. 32 Motion to Dismiss is terminated. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 4/26/18. [Copy mailed to plaintiff](LDR) |
Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/12/2018 (dtj) |
Filing 27 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Amend Dismissal Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 12/14/2017 (dtj) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL, claims against defendants Hattiesburg Police Department, Hattiesburg Internal Affairs and City of Hattiesburg are dismissed with prejudice. Hattiesburg Police Department, City of Hattiesburg and Hattiesburg Internal Affairs terminated as defendants. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 11/8/17. [Copy mailed to plaintiff] (LDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.