Espinoza v. Akinwale
Plaintiff: Roldolfo Espinoza
Defendant: Abumer Akinwale, M.D.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00032
Filed: February 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, the Court grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 34 . Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 02/01/2019. [Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff] (CS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Espinoza v. Akinwale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roldolfo Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abumer Akinwale, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?