Rawls v. Institutions of Higher Learning et al
| Avery Rawls |
| Marjorie Geisz-Everson, Nina McLain, University of Southern Mississippi and Institutions of Higher Learning |
| 2:2018cv00141 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Forrest |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/24/2018 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 10/19/18. (KPM) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Marjorie Geisz-Everson, Institutions of Higher Learning, Nina McLain, University of Southern Mississippi.(Norton, Rick) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. University of Southern Mississippi served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. Marjorie Geisz-Everson served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. Nina McLain served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
Filing 11
ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Additional Time or to Dismiss Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 09/18/2018 (lm)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. University of Southern Mississippi served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. Marjorie Geisz-Everson served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. Nina McLain served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Avery Rawls. Institutions of Higher Learning served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Teeuwissen, Pieter) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Institutions of Higher Learning, University of Southern Mississippi (Norton, Rick) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Marjorie Geisz-Everson, Institutions of Higher Learning, Nina McLain, University of Southern Mississippi. (CS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Institutions of Higher Learning, University of Southern Mississippi (Norton, Rick) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Institutions of Higher Learning answer due 9/14/2018; University of Southern Mississippi answer due 9/14/2018. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on August 17, 2018 (KPM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rick D. Norton on behalf of Institutions of Higher Learning, University of Southern Mississippi (Norton, Rick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marjorie Geisz-Everson, Institutions of Higher Learning, Nina McLain, University of Southern Mississippi (Filing fee $400 receipt number 24643005824), filed by Avery Rawls. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
