Miller v. Ford Motor Company
L. Z. Miller |
Ford Motor Company |
2:2018cv00176 |
October 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Memorandum Opinion and Order re #2 MOTION to Dismiss . The Court grants Defendants Motion to Dismiss #2 . Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. This case is closed. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/14/2019. (LDR) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #8 : Incorrect event chosen. This document should have been docketed as Reply to Response to Motion. Court staff has revised docket entry to reflect correct event. (LDR) |
Filing 8 Reply to RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company (Kidd, Dean) Modified on 11/6/2018 (LDR). |
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. The response shall be deemed timely filed. The reply is due 11/2/18. No further order will issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/29/18. (cb) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by L. Z. Miller (Shiyou, Orvis) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by L. Z. Miller (Shiyou, Orvis) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 MOTION to Dismiss by L. Z. Miller (Shiyou, Orvis) |
Filing 4 ORDER re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company. Response due on or before 10/25/18, and reply due on or before 11/1/18. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/15/18. (cb) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company (Kidd, Dean) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Ford Motor Company (Kidd, Dean) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Marion County Circuit Court, case number 46CI1:17-cv-00235-PH. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3825763) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons Returned -re Ford Motor Company, #3 Exhibit State Court Record)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: L. Z. Miller | |
Represented By: | Orvis A. Shiyou, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Dean Sterling Kidd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.