Holcim (US) Inc. v. Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc.
| Holcim (US) Inc. |
| Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00181 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: The parties do not consent; Disclosures due by 12/20/2018; Jury Trial set for a two week term beginning 9/2/2019 before District Judge Keith Starrett; ETT: 1 day; Pretrial Conference set for 8/15/2019 before District Judge Keith Starrett; Discovery due by 4/15/2019; Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 12/31/2018; Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 12/31/2018; Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 2/15/2019; Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 3/15/2019; Motions due by 5/1/2019; settlement conference or private mediation to be completed by discovery deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on December 7, 2018 (KPM)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 12/6/2018. A case management order will be entered. PARTICIPANTS: Matt Dowd for plaintiff; Joel Johnson for defendant. (KPM) |
| Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 12/6/2018 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 11/30/18. (KPM) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc..(Johnson, S.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by S. Joel Johnson on behalf of Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. (Johnson, S.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Holcim (US) Inc.. Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. served on 10/23/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (Dowd, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. (CS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0538-3834216), filed by Holcim (US) Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Credit Application, #3 Exhibit B-Terms and Conditions of Sale, #4 Exhibit C-Invoices, #5 Exhibit D-Account Statement) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holcim (US) Inc. v. Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Holcim (US) Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew R. Dowd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Southeastern Concrete Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | S. Joel Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
