Owens v. McDonald et al
| Lakeisha Owens |
| James R. Breslove, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., John Does 1-99 and Eddie McDonald |
| 2:2018cv00220 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Withdraw #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by James R. Breslove, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (Still, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Eddie McDonald (Stubbs, William) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Eddie McDonald (Stubbs, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William Kannan Stubbs on behalf of Eddie McDonald (Stubbs, William) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by W. Terrell Stubbs on behalf of Eddie McDonald (Stubbs, W.) |
TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court . The Court grants the parties' motion to extend the time to respond and reply to the Motion to Remand. Responses are due by 2/15/2019. Replies are due by 2/22/2019. No further order will issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/31/19. (cb)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (Still, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER staying discovery and disclosure requirements pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on January 18, 2019 (KPM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Lakeisha Owens. Response due on or before 1/31/19; reply due on or before 2/7/19. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/18/19. (cb)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #6 , #7 : Wrong case number. Attorney is directed to correct the error in future filings and use Case No.: 2:18-cv-220-KS-MTP. (CS) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Lakeisha Owens (Armistad, Alvin) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Lakeisha Owens (Armistad, Alvin) |
| Filing 5 State Court Record by Defendants James R. Breslove, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (Spratlin, Arthur) |
| Filing 4 Separate ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by James R. Breslove (Spratlin, Arthur) |
| Filing 3 Separate ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (Spratlin, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan H. Still on behalf of James R. Breslove, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (Still, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by James R. Breslove, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. from Circuit Court of Jones County, Mississippi, case number 34CI2:18-cv-00073. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0538-3880443) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B-Summons and Complaint) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
