Cooley v. Stovall et al
| Stormi-Dale Rose Cooley |
| Keith A. Stovall and John Does 1-5 |
| 2:2019cv00093 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/3/2019 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 9/27/19. (KPM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Martin, Jr on behalf of Keith A. Stovall (Martin, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Keith A. Stovall.(Savarese, Steven) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stormi-Dale Rose Cooley. Keith A. Stovall served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Anderson, Paul) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Keith A. Stovall. (LDR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas A. Puckett on behalf of Stormi-Dale Rose Cooley (Puckett, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-5, Keith A. Stovall ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4017496), filed by Stormi-Dale Rose Cooley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
