Division21, Inc. v. Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP et al
Division21, Inc. |
John Does 1-10, Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP and Sunil Shah |
2:2019cv00137 |
September 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #4 : Wrong event chosen. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #4 , #5 : Proposed orders are not to be electronically filed as a separate pleading or as an attachment to a pleading, but instead are to be provided to chambers by e-mail (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec.5.B.). L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #5 : Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings. In the future when using previously filed documents, delete the header which shows the case number, document number and filing date before refiling. This will enable the new heading to be clearly visible. Please check the pdf document for errors before filing. It is not necessary to refile. (CS) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay Proceedings. All other pending motions will be denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/3/2019 (lm) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Responsive pleadings will be addressed following stay. No further written order shall issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/3/2019 (lm) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit agreement, #2 Attachment order)(Hays, Bradley) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Attachment)(Hays, Bradley) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP (Attachments: #1 Attachment ppd Order)(Hays, Bradley) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP identifying Corporate Parent NCG Capital Partners LLC for Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP. (Hays, Bradley) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP answer due 10/2/2019. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on September 18, 2019 (KPM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gateway Lodging Associates, LLP from Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, case number W19-0158. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 24643006425) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Documents) (CS) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #1 : PDF [1-2], Pages 19-24 attached to this entry are illegible. Attorney is advised to correct the error by refiling the document/pages using the event ATTACHMENT and linking the document to the Complaint. (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.