Ramey et al v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
| R Bro Entertainment, LLC, Hebert Taylor Ramey and Charles Bradford Ramey |
| City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Toby Barker |
| 2:2020cv00098 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Cory Nathan Ferraez on behalf of R Bro Entertainment, LLC, Charles Bradford Ramey, Hebert Taylor Ramey (Ferraez, Cory) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Toby Barker, City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. (LDR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Toby Barker, City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 720109), filed by Charles Bradford Ramey, Hebert Taylor Ramey, R Bro Entertainment, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State of MS Executive Order No. 1463, #3 Exhibit B - State of MS Executive Order No. 1466, #4 Exhibit C - State of MS Executive Order No. 1477, #5 Exhibit D - Executive Order No. 2020-2, #6 Exhibit E - Executive Order No. 2020-1, #7 Exhibit F - Notices to Appear in Court, #8 Exhibit G - Jump In Gym Pics, #9 Exhibit H - Tate Reeves Remarks, #10 Exhibit I - Affidavit of John C. Nelson, M.D., #11 Exhibit J - Coronavirus Article)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
