Cooley v. Lamar County Sheriff Department et al
Eva S. Cooley |
Lamar County Sheriff Danny Rigel, The Board of Supervisors Lamar County, Mississippi, 1-10 John Does, Lamar County Jail and Lamar County Sheriff Department |
2:2020cv00196 |
October 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Taylor B. McNeel for all further proceedings. District Judge Keith Starrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 12/18/2020 (LDR) |
Attorneys/Parties are advised to include the case number and new judge assignment of 2:20-cv-196-TBM-MTP on future filed pleadings. (LDR) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 28, 2020. (AS) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eva S. Cooley. (CS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1-10 John Does, Lamar County Jail, Lamar County Sheriff Department, Danny Rigel, The Board of Supervisors Lamar County, Mississippi, filed by Eva S. Cooley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.