Rankin v. Professional Security Corporation et al
Plaintiff: MkHennzie Rankin
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-5 and Professional Security Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv00215
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Taylor B McNeel
Referring Judge: Michael T Parker
2 Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2020 Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2021 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 1/22/21. (KPM)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Taylor B. McNeel for all further proceedings. District Judge Keith Starrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 12/18/2020. (CS)
December 18, 2020 Attorneys are advised to include the case number and new judge assignment of 2:20-cv-00215-TBM-MTP on future pleadings. (CS)
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE to Take Deposition of MkHennzie Rankin by Professional Security Corporation (Hicks, Clark)
November 30, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Professional Security Corporation (Hicks, Clark)
November 23, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MkHennzie Rankin. Professional Security Corporation served on 11/18/2020, answer due 12/9/2020. (Brown, Michael)
November 20, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Professional Security Corporation from Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, case number H20-148. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4422110) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certified State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LDR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rankin v. Professional Security Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Security Corporation
Represented By: Clark Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MkHennzie Rankin
Represented By: Michael R. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?