Hicks v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Jamye L. Hicks |
| John Does 1-5 and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00016 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Dismissal by Jamye L. Hicks (Jaques, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. from Circuit Court of Jones County, MS, case number 2021-01-CV1. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0538-4482757) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Circuit Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Circuit Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Certified Copy of State Court File, #5 Exhibit D - Affidavit, Annual Report, Entity Summary)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
