Johnson v. W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sandra Johnson
Defendant: W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. and John Does (1-10)
Case Number: 2:2021cv00122
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: John C Gargiulo
Referring Judge: Halil S Ozerden
2 Judge: Robert H Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes filed by W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. (Baker, Tammy)
November 9, 2021 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion, #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes filed by Sandra Johnson (Ivison, William)
November 9, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes filed by Sandra Johnson (Ivison, William)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting as unopposed Plaintiff's Motion #9 to Extend the Deadline to File a Response to Defendant W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc.'s Motion #6 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc.'s Motion #6 is now due on or before November 9, 2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on October 29, 2021. (ENW)
October 28, 2021 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes - by 1 week - by Sandra Johnson (Ivison, William)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William C. Ivison on behalf of Sandra Johnson (Ivison, William)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER staying proceedings. A #6 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes has been filed. Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B), the attorney conference, disclosure requirements, and all discovery are stayed, pending the Courts ruling on the #6 Motion. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 10/20/21 (TS)
October 19, 2021 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes filed by W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. (Baker, Tammy)
October 19, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Enforce the Parties' Agreement to Arbitrate Their Disputes by W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Cyrus Nicholson)(Baker, Tammy)
October 19, 2021 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #6 #7 : Incorrect Judge Assignment in Style of Case; Incorrect Case Number Listed. Attorney is advised to include the correct judge assignment and civil action number 2:21-cv-122-HSO-RHWR on future filed pleadings. This case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on October 1, 2021. (LDR)
October 3, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Ivison, William)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 10/1/2021. (LDR)
October 1, 2021 Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's initials RHWR on future filings. (LDR)
October 1, 2021 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3 : A return on summons should not be filed without the first page, as issued, preceding the return. Attorney is directed to refile. (LDR)
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 **ERROR, DISREGARD THIS ENTRY** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Johnson. W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. served on 9/28/2021, answer due 10/19/2021. (Ivison, William) Modified on 10/1/2021 (LDR).
September 28, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. (CS)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does (1-10), W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMSSDC-4660845), filed by Sandra Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Johnson
Represented By: Ken R. Adcock
Represented By: William C. Ivison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W.E. Blain and Sons, Inc.
Represented By: Tammy L. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does (1-10)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?