Watson v. Forrest County ADC
Sidney Dewayne Watson |
Forrest County ADC |
Pro Se Department |
2:2022cv00009 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Robert P Myers |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Clerk's memorandum in response to plaintiff's Letter #8 requesting information. (LDR) |
Filing 10 MOTION to issue subpoena to Forrest County for sick calls and grievance forms by Sidney Dewayne Watson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LDR) |
Filing 9 Letter from Sidney Watson regarding lockdown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LDR) |
Filing 8 Letter from Sidney Watson requesting information about his cases. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LDR) |
Filing 7 Response to Order re #6 ORDER, filed by Sidney Dewayne Watson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LDR) |
|
|
Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2, Acknowledgement filed by Sidney Dewayne Watson. #1 Envelope) (LDR). |
|
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Sidney Dewayne Watson. (LDR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Forrest County ADC, filed by Sidney Dewayne Watson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) #2 Notice of Assignment) (LDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.