Poore v. Commissioner of Social Security
Martha Gail Poore |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA General Counsel |
2:2022cv00049 |
April 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Michael T Parker |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/18/2022, answer due 8/16/2022. Service made upon: U S Attorney; U S Attorney General; Commissioner of SSA. (LDR) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LDR) |
Filing 4 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for the Commissioner of Social SecurityAdministration. U.S. Marshal shall serve the defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 4/20/2022. (LDR) |
Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER. (Copy forwarded to pro se plaintiff via U.S. Mail.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on April 19, 2022 (KPM) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Martha Gail Poore. (LDR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Martha Gail Poore. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Decision, #2 Notice of Appeals Council, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.