Peters v. Mississippi Attorney General et al
| Carl Lee Peters |
| Mississippi Attorney General, State of Mississippi, Robert Glen Waddle, Judge Gwen W. Broom, Lawrence E. Hahn and Michael T. Kuykendall |
| 2:2023cv00011 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on February 1, 2023. (js)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF Recusal of Magistrate Judge Pursuant to 28 USCS Sec 455 by Carl Lee Peters. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Carl Peters, #2 Proposed Order)(LDR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Carl Lee Peters. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Carl Peters)(LDR) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 185740 (LDR) |
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Lee Peters. (CS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gwen W. Broom, Lawrence E. Hahn, Michael T. Kuykendall, Mississippi Attorney General, State of Mississippi, Robert Glen Waddle, filed by Carl Lee Peters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Notice of Assignment) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
