Mills v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
| DreShun Mills |
| Mississippi Department of Corrections |
| Pro Se Department |
| 2:2023cv00036 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before May 11, 2023, Petitioner shall file a written response showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Court Order #3 . Petitioner shall submit payment of the $5.00 filing fee on or before May 11, 2023. Show Cause Response due by 5/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac on 4/27/2023. (LDR)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner has 30 days from the entry of this Order to submit the $5.00 filing fee to the Court. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/13/2023. (LDR)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DreShun Mills. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LDR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DreShun Mills. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) #2 Notice of Assignment) (LDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
