The Handy Pantry et al v. The City of Hattiesburg, Misissippi
| The Handy Pantry and Lucas Tucker |
| The City of Hattiesburg, Misissippi and The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi |
| 2:2023cv00096 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (corrected with Exhibits) against The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, filed by The Handy Pantry, Lucas Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Hattiesburg Ordinance 3258, #2 Exhibit B: Complaint and Citation, #3 Exhibit C: Seized and Cited Items a.) Containers b.) A glass c.) A grinder d.) A hookah e.) Various Pipes)(Lawrence, Matt) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: The parties do not consent; Bench Trial set for a two week term beginning 8/5/2024 before District Judge Keith Starrett; ETT: 2 days; Pretrial Conference set for 7/18/2024 before District Judge Keith Starrett; Discovery due by 3/1/2024; Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 9/25/2023; Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 9/25/2023; Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 12/1/2023; Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 1/8/2024; Motions due by 3/15/2024; ADR Report due by 7/11/2024; ADR to be completed by discovery deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on August 25, 2023 (KPM)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi.(Reed, T.) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #9 : The "ATTACHMENT" document is an exhibit. Pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) all supporting exhibits must be identified by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to link this attachment document to the related filing and to text in the exhibit information in the modify text screen. (CS) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 8/25/2023. A case management order will be entered. PARTICIPANTS: Matt Lawrence for Plaintiffs; Michael Reed and Randy Pope for Defendant. (KPM) |
| Filing 9 ATTACHMENT re #8 Amended Complaint Exhibits A-C by Lucas Tucker (Lawrence, Matt) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, filed by The Handy Pantry, Lucas Tucker.(Lawrence, Matt) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Agreed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file the Second Amended Complaint that was attached to the Motion on or before August, 28, 2023. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on August 21, 2023.(ST)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by The Handy Pantry (Lawrence, Matt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct by The Handy Pantry, Lucas Tucker (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint)(Lawrence, Matt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Initial Disclosure by The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi (Reed, T.) |
| Filing 4 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2023 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 8/18/23. (KPM) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Keith Starrett: Telephone Conference held on 7/27/2023. Parties present on the call: for the Plaintiff, Matt W. Lawrence; for the Defendant T. Michael Reed and Randy Pope. Parties agreed to continue litigation. The Court will proceed with a Case Management Conference. Court Reporter/Transcriber Fred Jeske, Telephone Number : 601-255-6432, E-mail : fred_jeske@mssd.uscourts.gov. (KJS) Modified on 7/27/2023 (lm). |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 7/27/2023 11:00 AM before District Judge Keith Starrett (KJS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Moran M. Pope, III on behalf of The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi (Pope, Moran) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi.(Reed, T.) |
| Set Hearings: Telephonic Status Conference set for 7/27/2023 11:00 AM before District Judge Keith Starrett. To begin call, parties are to dial (877)336-1828 and enter Code 940-8529 to access call. (KJS) |
| Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 718. (CS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The City of Hattiesburg, Misissippi from Chancery Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, case number 8CH1:23-cv-00293-S. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 184913) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint/Permanent Injunction/Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Stay of Enforcement, #3 Exhibit B - Motion for Preliminary Injunction/A Stay Enjoining the City of Hattiesburg from Enforcing Ordinance 3258, #4 State Court Record)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
