Clifton et al v. Harold
| Vickie Clifton and Nicky Clifton |
| James S. Harold |
| 2:2023cv00107 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by James S. Harold (Stovall, David) |
| Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2023 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 9/28/23. (KPM) |
| Filing 4 Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by James S. Harold.(Stovall, David) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vickie Clifton, Nicky Clifton. James S. Harold served on 8/12/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certified Mail Receipt James Harold signature 8-12-23)(Baine, Louis) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to James S. Harold. (CS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James S. Harold (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMSSDC-5175097), filed by Vickie Clifton, Nicky Clifton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
