Cox v. Lee Co. Sheriff Dept.
| Michael Cox |
| Lee Co. Sheriff Dept. |
| Pro Se Department |
| 2:2023cv00153 |
| October 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Keith Starrett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before December 13, 2023, pro se Petitioner Michael Cox shall either pay the $5.00 filing fee; apply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; or file a written response showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to obey an Order #2 of the Court. Show Cause Response due by 12/13/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 11/29/2023. (LDR)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: on or before 11/15/2023, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 10/16/2023. (CS)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Cox. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
