Thompson v. American Express Company
| Jeremy Andrew Thompson |
| American Express Company |
| 2:2024cv00004 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by American Express Company (Mulholland, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by American Express Company (Mulholland, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Chelsea C. Lewis on behalf of American Express Company (Lewis, Chelsea) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff stated he would agree to the extension, but only with certain conditions regarding his balances owed. The motion for extension of time to answer is granted without the conditions proposed by Plaintiff. Defendant American Express Company's answer or other responsive pleading is due 3/6/2024. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on February 8, 2024 (pl)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by American Express Company (Mulholland, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENT Stating Additional Complaints re #1 Complaint by Jeremy Andrew Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit L-Email from American Express) (CS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeremy Andrew Thompson. American Express Company served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Domestic Return Receipt) (CS) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to American Express Company. (CS) |
| Filing 1 Verified COMPLAINT against American Express Company (Filing fee $405 receipt number 1125), filed by Jeremy Andrew Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Demand for Expedited Credit Extension, #3 Exhibit B-Opportunity to Cure, #4 Exhibit C-Notice of Default, #5 Exhibit D-Return Receipts, #6 Exhibit E-Return Receipts, #7 Exhibit F-Letter from American Express dated 09/11/2023, #8 Exhibit G-Letter from American Express 09/14/2023, #9 Exhibit H-Letter from American Express dated 09/25/2023, #10 Exhibit I-Letter from American Express dated 10/06/2023, #11 Exhibit J-Card Member Agreement, #12 Exhibit K-Bills of Exchange/Checks, #13 Notice of Assignment) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. American Express Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeremy Andrew Thompson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Express Company | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Mulholland |
| Represented By: | Chelsea C. Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
