Patterson v. Guidroz et al
| Dustin Lee Patterson |
| Zach Guidroz, Garrett Douglas, Laura Stogner and Sherrie Pendarvis |
| Pro Se Department |
| 2:2024cv00010 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Sherrie Pendarvis on 03/11/2024. Waiver of Service due by 4/10/2024. (CS) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Laura Stogner on 03/11/2024. Waiver of Service due by 4/10/2024. (CS) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Garrett Douglas on 03/11/2024. Waiver of Service due by 4/10/2024. (CS) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Zach Guidroz on 03/11/2024. Waiver of Service due by 4/10/2024. (CS) |
Filing 11
ORDER, Clerk is directed to issue Notices of Lawsuit and Requests to Waive Service of a Summons for Defendants. Defendants are directed to file a signed Waiver form or a Response within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 03/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Lawsuit-Guidroz, #2 Notice of Lawsuit-Douglas, #3 Notice of Lawsuit-Stogner, #4 Notice of Lawsuit-Pendarvis, #5 Waiver of Service) (CS)
|
| Filing 10 Response to #7 ORDER filed by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION (Unsigned) to Appoint Counsel by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND: Plaintiff shall file a written response consistent with this Order by February 29, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 2/15/2024 (CRT)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 2/15/2024 (CRT)
|
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2. Acknowledgement filed by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENT of claim re #1 Complaint by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 2/28/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 1/29/2024 (CRT)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Commissary Account, #2 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Garrett Douglas, Zach Guidroz, Sherrie Pendarvis, Laura Stogner, filed by Dustin Lee Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
