Picayune All In, LLC. v. EMC Insurance Companies et al
Picayune All In, LLC. |
EMC Insurance Companies and Employers' Mutual Casualty Company |
2:2024cv00027 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Halil S Ozerden |
Bradley W Rath |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorneys Harry Cummins and Martin Durkin be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Plaintiff Picayune All In, LLC. in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 4/24/2024 (AB) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Martin Durkin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5389329) by Picayune All In, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Letter in Good Standing)(Varnado, Carey) |
Filing 8 ATTACHMENT re #7 MOTION for Harry Cummins to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5386526) (Replacement of Doc 7-1) by Picayune All In, LLC. (Varnado, Carey) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Harry Cummins to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5386526) by Picayune All In, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Letter in Good Standing, #2 Attachment Letter in Good Standing, #3 Attachment Letter in Good Standing)(Varnado, Carey) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to [7-1]: Attachment 1 to this entry is corrupted and cannot be opened. Attorney is advised to correct the error by refiling Attachment 7-1 as "Attachment" and link it to Document #7 . (LDR) |
Filing 6 Response to Order re #5 ORDER Requiring Parties to Establish Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/3/2024. (STR) filed by EMC Insurance Companies, Employers' Mutual Casualty Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Certificate, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 2022 Annual Report, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 2023 Annual Report)(Reviere, Russell) |
Filing 5 ORDER Requiring Parties to Establish Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/3/2024. (STR) |
Filing 4 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint Second by EMC Insurance Companies, Employers' Mutual Casualty Company.(Reviere, Russell) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) against Employers' Mutual Casualty Company, filed by Picayune All In, LLC..(Varnado, Carey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by EMC Insurance Companies, Employers' Mutual Casualty Company from Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, case number 23-CV-00175. (Filing fee $405 receipt number AMSSDC-534593) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-State Court Filings) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.