Reynolds v. Ockmand et al
| Kimberly Reynolds |
| Paul Ockmand, Jr., Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2024cv00036 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Michael T Parker |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ford Motor Company (Smith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 27
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 26
RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reynolds Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Reeves Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Reeves Ockmand Answer Counterclaim and Cross Claim, #4 Exhibit D - Reynolds - PL proposed 1st Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - Reeves - Ockmand Depo pages)(Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 24
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Orig Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Ockmand's Counter-Cross Claim (Reeves case))(Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 23
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company (Smith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Paul Ockmand, Jr (Moore, Peyton)
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Paul Ockmand, Jr (Moore, Peyton)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Ayers on behalf of Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Ayers, David)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER staying discovery and disclosure requirements pending a ruling on the Motion to Remand #17 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on April 8, 2024 (KPM)
|
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Kimberly Reynolds (Ellingburg, C.)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Remand to State Court by Kimberly Reynolds (Ellingburg, C.)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kimberly Reynolds (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Reeves State Court Complaint)(Ellingburg, C.)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Kimberly Reynolds (Ellingburg, C.)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Kimberly Reynolds (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Reeves Complaint)(Ellingburg, C.)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Stirgus on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Stirgus, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Paul Ockmand, Jr (Atkins, Jay)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss by Paul Ockmand, Jr (Atkins, Jay)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(Smith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 9
State Court Record by Defendants Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Volumes 1 (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 8
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 6
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 5
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Rogers, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 2
Joinder in Document by Ford Motor Company to #1 Notice of Removal,,, filed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (Smith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. from Circuit Court of Lamar County, Mississippi, case number 37:24cv004. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5356141) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Docs Served on Toyota, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LDR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
