The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Kuhlman Electric Corporation et al
||September 29, 2005
||US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
||Linda R. Anderson
||Henry T. Wingate
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 28, 2012
ORDER granting 278 Motion to Extend Deadline; granting 285 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 288 Motion to Stay Proceedings; granting 289 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 290 Motion for Leave to F ile; granting 294 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 301 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 302 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 303 Mo tion for Extension of Time to File; finding as moot 304 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Further, all discovery in this matter is stayed until this court rules upon Traveler's motion for summary judgment [docket 286] and Kuhlman Electric Corporation's motion to restate, supplement and/or amend pleadings [docket no. 268]. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 8/28/12 (TRS)
|April 20, 2009
ORDER denying Travelers' 188 Motion to Compel, without prejudice. The undersigned shall conduct a telephonic status conference on 6/24/09 at 9:30 a.m. to review the status of the proceedings. The motion may be reconsidered at that time regarding discovery related to the underlying UEMs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 4/20/09. (ACF)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?