McCullough v. Owens Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Michael McCullough |
| Owens Enterprises, Inc. and John Does 1 through 5 |
| 3:2007cv00527 |
| September 7, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Tom S. Lee |
| James C. Sumner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT: that this cause came on for hearing upon the motion of the parties, ore tenus, to approve a full and final settlement and final judgment and it appearing to the Court that this cause has been compromised and settled and the Cou rt, having considered the same and being fully advised in the premises, finds that said motion is well taken, should be and the same is hereby granted. That the claims, counterclaims and/or cause/causes of action sought to be maintained by Plaintiff and Defendant herein be, and the same is/are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 9/18/09 (SEC)
|
|
Filing
32
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 24 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of Counts I, II and IV of Defendant Owens Enterprises, Inc.'s Counterclaim, granting 22 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of the validity of his copyright. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 2/3/09 (LWE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
